Letter to the Editor - Two
Trips and a Whinge
I recently competed in the NSW 6 hour Socialgaine in
Belanglo forest, and in the ACT Spring 12 hour near Nimmitabel. Both
events were enjoyable and (apart from the leeches) relatively
painless; thanks to the organisers. For those that missed the
Belanglo event, a new (to me) concept was to have mystery controls,
which were not marked on the map, but had clues at other controls so
that route choice could not be finalised before the start. This made
it more interesting; I am not sure what it did to the overall
score-line.
During both of these events, partly due to the
number of participants who chose similar routes to my team, I
witnessed extensive cheating. For some teams, notably consisting of
a couple or father and child, the normal practice seems to be to
leave the girlfriend/child waiting at the trail while the
(presumably faster) team member leaves the trail and goes to punch
the control. In part, the map of the Nimmitabel event encouraged
this, as most of the controls were within 100 m of a trail (due to
rough terrain the organisers placed them this way deliberately).
Some of the teams doing this were very experienced, and it was done
in a blatant manner - the slower team member often did not even
attempt to leave the road, in front of several other teams.
I have confronted teams about this on my last two
rogaines, following the example set by my teammate on the NSW
champs. On that occasion, after we struggled back up to a track
after descending steeply in the dark through thick undergrowth to
one control, he mentioned to a team (which had left the female
partner sitting at the track) that the rules state that all team
members must approach within 20 m of a control and see it. They
denied having broken this rule in spite of the obvious nature of
what they had done. In the two rogaines where I have mentioned this
to teams, I have had similar responses, and once "I'm not a
mountain goat like you".
Cheating like this breaches both the rules and the
spirit of rogaining. It is not acceptable. If a person is too slow
and it is frustrating to wait for them, their "partner"
should rogaine with someone else. The family category is not
expected to achieve the same point score as the open category,
precisely because the child must visit every control. A girlfriend
or wife is not going to learn navigation and be empowered if she is
"dropped off" at the trail while her partner punches the
control. If a person is not prepared to scramble down a cliff to a
control, the team does not punch that control, unless they find a
way to get to it together.
Apart from the moral objection to cheating, there is
also a safety issue - if one person became injured while the team is
separated, they may have trouble finding each other.
I believe that the solution to this problem is
two-fold:
-
any team, which sees another team cheating,
should remind them of the rules on the spot (please don't leave
it to me - I can't patrol everyone!). If someone thinks you are
cheating and you are not, but your partner is out of sight,
don't be offended at the accusation.
-
organisers should be prepared to disqualify a
team which is reported by several other teams as having cheated.
I realise that this is harsh, but they certainly wouldn't do it
again.
The setters can also assist by setting a course in
which most route choices will take people past a control, continuing
from there, rather than short "there and back" sections to
punch controls. Obviously, this is not always possible, but it can
be kept in mind. I am not a great rogainer, but I love this unique
sport and I think that those who chose to participate should do so
within the rules, or find another sport (orienteering?).
Madeleine Schultz
|